Thursday, June 3, 2010

GMOS

Lindsey Crawford

Library 201


GMOs

All the sites were clear, easy to navigate through and current, but that tells me only that they are aware that packaging is important. However, I do believe that in order to get any message across one must present themselves as professional, which all the sites do. Content is the most important thing to me in evaluating websites. The content in the three varied, but here’s what I thought:

The Monsanto site confirmed my initial suspicions about them: they are out to make a profit and nothing else. Leading me to this idea is the lack of fair and balanced information about GMOs in their site. They clearly document the process and benefits of GMOs but offer no information to the other side: GMOs are not natural and there have been documented cases of their danger. Furthermore, they do not go into detail about how GMOs are made. To alter the DNA of a plant cell, viruses, such as ecoli, are used to get into the cellular wall. This information is not on their site. Just because they offer scientific definitions, videos and graphs and charts does not mean that they are experts on the subject. Also disquieting was the lack of because and therefore to their claims. I believe that credibility relies on things like warrants and impacts. Scitable seems more credible because they offer the pros and cons of GMOs. There purpose seems to be to inform and not to sell. I am also more inclined to trust their information because they have there references listed. The Say No To GMOs site, like the Monsanto one, also has a clear agenda. And while I agree with their information, I am inclined to distrust their site because of this clear slant. There purpose is to inform, but also to call to action.

I do have qualms and fears about GMOs. The process of breaking into the cellular wall, described above, does make me hesitant about trusting them. Furthermore, the fact that those in the food industry are opposed to labeling GMOs makes me distrust them because it leads me to believe that they are aware of a danger and are afraid of lawsuits.


Haugen, David M. and Musser, Susan, Genetic Engineering. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009

Monday, May 31, 2010

Favorite Recipe? Without a doubt Lamb and Cabbage+veggies


I honestly can't say too much about this recipe because its basically just something my mom cooked up for St. Patrick's day and continued to do so ever since I was in Middle School. Its a healthy meal, a hot meal, and VERY tasty. Mouthwatering and easy to chew as well.
Its always been my favorite holiday meal because its simple and easy to make so it doesn't create a lot of fuss around the house when its being made. Since St. Patrick's day is not a very big holiday for my family and the dinner is just about the only way we celebrate it. My family on my mother's side has a lineage in Ireland and so my mom likes to go on about that nonsense but mostly I'm just concerned about eating a good dinner.

You can find the basics of this meal here:
http://glugleglutenfree.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/crockpot-lamb-and-cabbage/

This page is set up in the style of a blog post by a random mother who enjoys cooking this meal for St. Patrick's day just like my own mum. Her thought processes make me think of my own mom so much I laughed to myself when reading it. Anyways, I hope somebody reads and enjoys it as much as I did.

That's pretty much all I've got for this post. I had a fun and easy quarter with this Food Libraries class and thanks to the prof for mediating it. ;D

Poutine

Lindsey Crawford

Library 201

31 May 2010

Final Blog


Poutine: an upstate NY and Northeastern Canadian favorite side dish, sometimes served as a meal.


Ingredients (these are subject to change based on personal preference): Frozen (or homemade) french fries, 2 cups shredded extra sharp cheddar cheese (the dish traditionally calls for cheese curds but you can use any cheese you like), 1 packet of turkey gravy mix (you can use the jar gravy, homemade or brown, it’s all about preference).


Cooking directions: preheat oven for frozen french fries. Then cook fries as directed. While fries are cooking, shred cheddar cheese. About 5 minutes before fries are done, whip up packet of gravy mix. When fries are completely cooked, pull them out of the oven. Then, put fries into a class cooking dish, top with cheese and then pour gravy on top. Afterwards, put the glass baking dish into the oven and cook for an additional 5 minutes or until cheese is melted. Voila! Eat delicious dish!


Gluten Free Breakfast Casserole

Choosing my favorite recipe would mean sharing my apple pie recipe and I have a few secret ingredients that I use; needless to say I'm not going to share that one. But I will share this one, which is pretty good if I do say so myself. I don't cook very much because my boyfriend loves cooking. When I do cook it is for the two of us and he has celiac, which means he can't eat gluten. This breakfast casserole is good even for dinner.
3 large potatoes
1lb Breakfast Sausage
7 eggs
8 oz. Cheddar Cheese
Butter

Prep:
Peel potatoes (can leave skin on)
Preheat the oven to 375.
Spray or butter 8x8 pan.

  1. Remove the sausage from the casing and brown slightly. It doesn't need to be fully done because it will be going into the oven.
  2. Slice the potatoes into thin slices. It is okay to leave the skin on, but many opt to peel them.
  3. Lay one layer of breakfast potatoes, about the amount of one potato. Add a layer of sausage, cover with more potatoes, then add a final layer of sausage and potatoes.
  4. Mix up the eggs. Feel free to add milk if you want, but it is not needed if you beat the eggs well.
  5. Cover the casserole with the eggs. Jostle the pan to make sure that the egg gets into all of the layers. Cover with the cheese.
  6. Bake for 30-45 minutes, until the cheese is melted and the potatoes are done. Enjoy!

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Recipe


This isn’t my favorite recipe (I could never choose), but one that I would definitely recommend for anyone who is interested in trying a Filipino dish. I mentioned helping my friend make lumpia growing up in a previous post, they are pretty standard. I don’t know the exact recipe, but this one that I found is close (Shanghai style). Of course you could substitute a lot of the veggies with anything you like (carrots, cilantro, green onion, celery, etc). There are tons of variation recipes online. And as a caution, it can be a tedious job rolling them, but well worth the effort. Enjoy!

Recipe: Lumpiang Shanghai (Filipino Spring Rolls filled with Pork)
Makes about 50 lumpia/spring rolls

Ingredients:

-1 package Lumpia wrappers (25 sheets); Chinese or Vietnamese spring roll wrappers meant for frying can be substituted.
-2 pounds ground pork
-5 cloves garlic, peeled and minced
-1-inch piece of ginger, peeled and minced
-2 tablespoons soy sauce
-2 eggs, lightly beaten
Freshly ground black pepper, to taste

Method:
-Using a serrated knife, cut the square lumpia wrappers in half so that you have two stacks of rectangular wrappers. Place a damp paper towel over the wrappers to keep them from drying out as you work.
-Combine the pork, garlic, ginger, soy sauce, eggs, and black pepper in a large bowl. Using your hands, or a rubber spatula, mix the filling well so that the seasonings are evenly distributed.
-Place one of the rectangular wrappers vertically on your work surface with the short edge facing you. Place a heaping teaspoon of the filling on the wrapper about half an inch from the edge closest to you. Grasp the bottom edge of the wrapper and roll it up and over the filling, continuing to roll until 2 inches of wrapper remain.
-Dip two fingers into a bowl of water then moisten the last 2 inches of wrapper with your fingers. Finish rolling the lumpia then rest them on their seam. Continue rolling with the rest of the filling and lumpia wrappers.
-At this point, you can freeze your rolled lumpia if you wish by placing them in freezer bags and then into your freezer.
-To cook the lumpia, fill a large frying pan with about 1/2-inch of vegetable oil. Heat the oil over medium-high heat. Gently place the lumpia into the hot oil and fry until golden brown on all sides, 3 to 5 minutes total (if frying frozen lumpia, it will take 1 to 2 minutes longer).
-Place the fried lumpia on paper towels and serve immediately with sweet and sour sauce (bottled from the store is fine).
(Note: You can also add finely minced raw shrimp to the pork mixture if you’d like. Also, instead of ground pork, you can use ground beef, or even ground turkey)

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

BLog #7 LikeS legitiMate looking weBsite

1. Monsanto
- The author is a large corporation.
- The author posts this information to satisfy investors.
- The author's inherent bias is its company's personal growth.
- Information is current as the copyright is 2010.
- Intended audience is investors, future employees, journalists, and anybody who wants information on Monsanto.
- You can contact the author(s) by submitting a message for queue.
- The design is clear and suspiciously easy to use.

2. GMOs - Scitable
- I don't know, dude! The Nature Publishing Group? Who are they?
- To better educate anyone and everyone about genetically modified organisms.
- It doesn't really have one bias because its a site that publishes journals which are biased by their specific author, not the owners of the website.
- The information is as current as the journal entry you are reading is dated.
- The intended audience is anyone who wants to learn about GMOs - probably more scientists.
- Yes, they have a customer service system similar to that of Monsanto where you submit a message for queue.
- This design is not as easy to use as Monsanto because there are pictures and picture-links everywhere on the pages that makes it rather confusing - its hard to tell what is a link and what isn't before you hover the mouse over it.

3. SAY NO TO GMOs
- "Different color schemes will help you can find your way around this complex site more easily." The author is obviously a high school sophomore in web design.
- To encourage grassroot movements against GMOs.
- The author inherently dislikes the idea of GMOs.
- The information on the site is aged from 2002 to 2010 - obviously an on-going class assignment.
- The information is intended for ANYONE and EVERYONE. Probably persons 12+years old.
- The site allows you to submit an email message through an on-site page.
- The design is very easy to use but does not look very good.


I feel that the Nature Publishing, Inc. site has the best information because all of its information is submitted by scientists who are producing research on genetics industriously. These people probably exclude as much bias *as possible* for the sake of showing results and data. The only room for bias probably exists in the room for error in the interpretation of data.

SAY NO TO GMOs is obviously the least authoritative of the sites because it has a poor layout, its a ".org" meaning organization, and it is collecting information solely for the purpose of convincing people that genetic modification is a bad thing IN EVERY WAY. It wants us to abandon the technology entirely and it won't stop until GMOs are banned worldwide.

I have no qualms about eating genetically modified foods because I don't feel that modifying the genetics of the food will increase the food's detrimental effects on my health. SAY NO TO GMOs listed pages saying that rats had trouble digesting Monsanto corn and that babies have trouble with GMOs - which is probably poorly interpreted data on a study that provides nothing but faulty statistics or the results are simply due to the organisms being studied not *naturally* being adapted to eating corn yet in the first place.

I believe that information is power and that all details about a food should be published for the consumer to be read before the purchase. I think that genetically modified foods should tell us that they are such because it would allow us to make educated buyer decisions. Do GMOs look tasty? Are they plumper? Are they just as nutritious? These are the things we should be able to compare WHILE WE ARE IN THE DAMNED STORE.

Bill Lambrecht. Dinner at the new Gene Café. New York : St. Martin's Press, c2001.

Monday, May 24, 2010

GMOs, hmm...

I am a senior and will be finishing my time at western in the next few weeks. For much of my time here I have used Ebsco because I can check the box for peer-reviewed material. I have found that many of my professor do not check the credibility of the article but I know as I enter the field people will be more apt to question my research. I felt that this assignment was useful as I will be doing more research outside the protection of Western Libraries databases.
When looking at the three articles presented for this weeks blog, I begun with Monsanto. Although it is presented in an easy to view and navigate, it also has a very large bias. It is promoting the biotechnology. If you are looking to find organization that support GMOs Monsanto will provide you with that information. As we discussed in class, very person as a bias; as a student it is important to understand that and to find information that both supports and questions your opinion. Say No to GMOs also has a bias, there is just the opposite of Monsanto. This site has no specific author but does seem to be updated month. It reminds me of Wikipedia -- although there is some credible information but you have to check the sources.
I believe that the nature.com information is the most trustworthy. Although there is no quick way to contact the author, information is presented by a respectable authority and is as recent as 2008.
My thoughts on GMOs are brief. I don't know much about them but I wish as a consumer there were easy to access information that is credible but also presents both sides of the argument. I try to watch what I put in my body but I find the things I shouldn't eat taste delicious. I maintain that moderation is the best.

"Pros and Cons of GMOs." Organic. Love To Kow, September 9, 2009. Web. 25 May 2010. .

Blog assignment #7

I read through the websites, not really sure what the next one would entail. When I finished reading through all three it seemed that two had the exact opposite information in it and one included each point of view. The purpose for posting the information on each site was pretty clear. The Monsanto site seemed focused on selling their product to farmers. Since there was a product involved it was clearly not going to address any negative side effects, even if they were aware of it's existence. Saynotogmo's was a site dedicated to educating Texans,a s well as the rest of society, sbout the dangers and effects of genetically engineering food. Nature.com, at first seemed to present the advancements and benefits of GMO's. Until I read further and realized it had information in support of and against GMO's.

I believe that the Scitable (Nature.com) site had the most reliable/authoritative information. It was the only site tha It included an author This site included references and links to other pertinent information.This site had credible information clearly posted. The second most credile site was 'Saynotogmo'. including reliable references and contact info, as well as being an organization. It was obviously biased, stating only the negative aspects of Genetically modifed organisms. Monsanto was, in my opinion, the least credible due to the fact that it's main purpose was the sale of a product. Monsanto was definitely the most biased, presenting GMO as the answer to the World's lack of food. I read absolutely nothing in this website that stated anything negative about gmo's, when there obviously are numerous concerns regarding this subject.

Until I began learning about genetically modifed foods in this course, the thought never crossed my mind that they couls be harmful. Actually I was oblivious to anything about this subject. I can't really say that I will stop eating any certain foods now that I am aware of this issue either. I do pay more attention to the things I buy, however my trips to the grocery store and the foods I buy have not changed. Maybe in the future, when I am not struggling to feed a family of six, I will be able to become pickier about my selections.

I cannot think of a reason that food shouldn't need to be labeled as containing genetically modified foods, when that is exactly what it contains. Consumers in America should be able to know exactly what it is they are buying.

McHughen, Alan "Pandora's picnic basket:the potential and hazards of Genetically Modified Foods" Oxford, New York: Oxford University; Press 2010

Saturday, May 22, 2010

GMOs

I thought that this assignment, as well as the corresponding in-class assignment, was very interesting and a learning experience for me regarding reliable sources. As a psychology major, I typically cite only peer-reviewed journal articles in my work. That is what we are taught to do, so I do not have much experience with other types of sources and I did not know how reliable they are in comparison to one another, I just knew that “journal articles were the most reliable and everything else is less reliable”. As for the three websites given for this assignment, I thought that the most reliable is the GMO article on nature.com. The author of the article has credentials. Even though the journal does not appear to be an academic one, I would say that it is more reliable than the other two sources. As for the other two sources, I think that they are about even when it comes to reliability. I think that the “say no to GMOs” website is the next most reliable source because they do use reliable references, have contact information, and they are an organization. Even though I believe they have good intent, they are definitely biased. As for the Monsanto source, I believe they are least reliable. I believe that they are even more biased because they are selling a product. They are going to market their products by highlighting or even misconstruing certain information and neglect information that is against their products.

As for genetically modified food itself, I do not have any qualms particularly, but I am somewhat fearful. Along with my general stance on previous posts, I do not have the time or resources to go out of my way to avoid certain foods. They are not going to have an instant effect on my health, but I am worried that there will be future effects and am very put off by what I have learned in documentaries such as Food Inc. I think that our government sucks in a lot of ways. There are so many things hidden and it is unsettling. I believe that foods should have better labeling. I would like foods to be labeled if they are genetically modified, mercury content (for fish), where it was imported from, etc. As a consumer that would be ideal. I can make more educated decisions of what I would be eating and I know it probably makes me sound lazy and that I should actually do my own research. No one is going to basically hand me the information by putting it on a label, but I think that it is more than simple research because so much is hidden well. I wonder why the FDA refuses to label for GMOs. It is scary to think that the reason they do not label is because they think that consumers would purchase less that is genetically modified food and only look at the monetary loss they would incur.

“GM faces unfair regulation in Europe” New Scientist 201 (2009): 5. Print.

Thomas, Pat. “Before you eat it ask: Just how ‘safe’ is it?” Ecologist 38 (2008): 21. Print.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Food Inc.

I mentioned to one of my co-workers that I had to watch Food Inc. for this class, her reaction told me alot about what to expect. She actually said she couldn't even finish watching it. It was either THAT BAD, or what is that saying..ignorance in bliss. Anyway, I wasn't too excited about watching Food Inc., I have to say it didn't dissapoint me.

I have to admit that this movie/documentary informed me of things that I did not know. I mean I had heard of E coli, I actually cant ever bring myself to eat at Jack in the Box because I remember years ago there was an E coli incident there. In all my ignorant bliss I really believed that something must have been done to fix such a serious problem, especially with children getting hurt by it. I never realized the extent of uncaring and inhumane treatment.

I work in the Tribal side of ICW ( Indian Child Welfare) and CPS, so I understand and see inhumanity on a regualr basis. However, I did not know that it had an effect all the way down to things sich as the food we eat. I dont think I will EVER walking into a grocery store and look at Food the same way. I've always been somewhat leary of fast food, but with four kids there are those nights that McDonalds seems so much easier than cooking. Now I realize it doesn't matter, I am putting my kids at rick regardless! That is a scarey thought, on top of the other issues for young kids.

How could the World possibly come to this? I always thought of farmers as hard-working people who loved the land we live on. I believed Farmers were people who probably didn't make much money, but had good morals and believed in waht they did. I understand that they are out there, although the reach of corporations is amazing to me.How can there be people who have the control to make a serious impact on the food industry, but don't.They could maybe even Stop the awful treatment of animals as well as the workers they employ. They must have families, and even kids at home. I wonder how 'they' would feel if one of their children died from Ecoli or Salmonella?

Monday, May 10, 2010

The Food Matrix o.o

My first reaction to the movie Food Inc. was "HOLY SHIT! THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS TELLING THE CLASS ABOUT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO!" What I wanted to describe to the class was that there is clearly MASSIVE amounts of energy, land, and animal life being sacrificed to bring our entire country its meals. These sacrifices are on an extraordinary scale.
This view of mine is located in a previous blog entry I had posted.

What did I find the most moving about this documentary?
The lack of faces willing to represent the machine of our food system. Not a single representative from one of the four major corporations was willing to show their face for an interview. What does this translate to in the eyes of the public? What I think it should translate to is a lack of willingness to take responsibility. The "corporation" is not a faceless entity - there are human beings working in the corporation's buildings as well as in their farms.
Every human being in America should be held accountable for their actions and the CEOs of major corporations should be no different. Regardless of what people end up thinking of them, personally.
They should at least have the courage to look a camera in the *eye* and say "What I am doing is legal, therefore, you cannot tell me it is wrong."

The methods used for creating masses of corn and wheat and patenting it is... dare I say, monopolization? And the methods of feeding the livestalk [with corn] in pens, standing knee deep in cow pie, is definitely unsanitary.
Altogether, it seems these four major corporations have taken the soul out of farming and advertise as though it still exists.

So where is the good? For all evils, there must be a good to counteract it, right?
Organic. 'nuff said.
Well maybe not. The farmer who was interviewed about his non-expansive organic farming practices was, in my opinion, a farming philosopher. And he was obviously completely connected with the production of his foods - preparing them for sale, by hand, and ON CAMERA. He showed that food can be produced in the abundance that our country needs WITHOUT relying on all of the repulsive practices of our friendly mass production corporations.

The message of this documentary was made very clear - its all in our hands, at the end of the day.
I think its a film everyone should see.
It was a pretty cool story bro.


Kevin's Law - S. 5450, 60th Cong. (2007) (enacted)

Food Inc.

Lindsey Crawford

Library 201

10 May 2010

6th Blog

Food Inc.

Food Inc. is a good flick. It is a combination of the Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma and Fast Food Nation. The first time I saw it, via Netflix last year, I was outraged, disturbed and shaken. Seeing how livestock, namely chickens, pigs and cows were treated on corporate farms was eye opening. Even more eye opening though was the way workers were treated: just like the animals, disposable and cheap. I found the chicken farming to be sharecropping for the 21st century. The farmer never gets ahead, just has to buy more and more infrastructure, take out more and more debt. Then on the flip side there is the grass farmer. His operation is clean, natural and the animals look happy. Yet, the reality check in all of this is that the small time grass farmer cannot feed the world unless he “scales up,” which by his own admission is not something he is willing to do because it will violate the integrity of his practice. So then this all begs the question? How can we feed the world and do so in a way that has integrity and is sustainable? Obviously the way we are doing things today has a lot of negative tradeoffs. More than 60% of the American population is either overweight or obese. Childhood diabetes is reaching epidemic proportions. Families are out of touch with each other because they don’t eat meals together. And what are the positive of this scenario? Cheap food, via corporate welfare for starters. I’m not sure what to make of it all. I’m not sure how fair and accurate Food Inc. is either. I mean, the reason we overeat sugar, salt and high fat foods is because these things are rare in nature. When we eat foods that are jacked up with them we cannot help but indulge in the sensory overload and crave more. That is something that Food Inc did not address; that is something that is usually not addressed at all in these journalistic views on eating habits. Although, Pollan did do a good job of talking about the biological want for the convenience of fast food. So I’m not sure what I am trying to say here, except that food and food habits is an extremely complex issue, one that cannot be covered in a documentary. Food Inc. did a good job waking the public up, but I wish it took things further.


Strum, Roland, “Childhood Obesity — What We Can Learn From Existing Data on Societal Trends, Part 1” Jan 2005. PubMed Central. CDC. Web 10 May 2010.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1323315/?report=abstract

Employee Inc.

Food Inc. is such a compelling movie. I have watched it a couple times before and each time I walk away disgusted. It isn't simply the treatment of the animals but the treatment of the people. America -- in the international community -- presents itself as this country where those that want to can make something of themselves. Think of the American dream; someone who starts out with nothing, works hard and pulls themselves up by their boot-straps. Does that really happen anymore? Can the American dream be achieved with employment opportunities presented in Food Inc? Wikipedia says, "The average chicken farmer employed by multinational corporation such as Tyson makes about $18,000 a year. However in order to make company standards they have on average invested $300,000 per chicken house with continuing mandatory upgrades." If one of those chicken house were closed, a company could pay 7.5 employees $40,000 a year. Not to say that $40,000 is a truly livable wage but it would be an upgrade. In the Human Services program we talk about shopping your morals. In our culture money drives much of what we do, so where we shop truly can effect change. I personally refuse to shop at Walmart because of the way they choose to treat their employees. There are days were I know it would be easier go pick up some really cheap items there but I am willing to pay a little more to shop at a company that treats their employees properly. We've discussed before the idea of having connection to our food; this for me is another point where I can connect. I would much rather purchase something knowing that those people who have made it possible for me to buy are being compensated properly. 


United States. Rule and Regulations and Statements of Procedure. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002. Print.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Food Inc.

It is always difficult to watch documentaries like these because ignorance is bliss. Documentaries like Bowling for Columbine, Super size Me and The Cove . I am thankful for the light that is shed on the issues that they cover, but it is disheartening at the same time. I feel like I should do something to change my behaviors in an effort to correct the problem, but I know I will likely be going back to McD's or eating the next Tyson chicken in the next few months. Psychologically, it is difficult for humans to change behavior when the environment doesn't change. Humans can't make the change by themselves, the companies do. I would recommend watching The Cove. It takes place in Japan and it is about dolphins that are hunted for their meat and are sold to markets as whale meat. Not only are people getting ripped off because whale meat is worth more than dolphin meat, but the dolphin meat has high levels of Mercury. The general population is obviously unaware of this, the government is able to cover it up. The same thing may possibly be happening in the US since when it comes to fish regulations, there are next to none.

As for Food Inc, I think that it illustrates perfectly that food that we should be eating is more expensive and it's not just an excuse. The family where the husband had diabetes and the family could only afford his meds or healthier food. I mean, there are probably some ways that they could have changed their diet that would still make it healthier than fast food, but it is difficult and takes some research to really do that, especially for working families with children. Things like the food libel laws are complete BS like when they were trying to sue Oprah for saying she won't eat hamburgers when there's no way they can prove that is what caused burger sales to drop. It's totally backwards, we should be protected from them, not the other way around.

As I mentioned earlier, I am glad to have some knowledge of what is happening after watching documentaries such as Food Inc, at the same time it is disheartening and stressful because it is difficult to fathom a solution.


Maryland. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration. Genetic Engineering: Fast Forwarding to Future Foods. Rockville: MD, 1996. Web. 7 May 2010.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Farmer's market?

Yeah that thing that... 10-3 o'clock on a Saturday?...
[ ] Kitchen
[ ] Eating Utensils
[ ] Bowls or plates
[x] Means of transportation
[ ] Any form of spices
[x] Friends with kitchen
[ ] Friends with kitchen that isn't trashed and full of dirty dishes
[ ] Oh right, and money.



Kramer, Kyle T. "The Magic of the Market." America 201.10 (2009): 9. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 5 May 2010.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Finding a connection to my food...

Unfortunately, I missed class last week due to a work issue and therefore missed knowing exactly what they assignment was. However, I did go to the Farmer's Market because it is my Saturday morning ritual this time of year. The fruit stands are my favorite. I use them as my snack for the week -- I often get fresh veggies as well. By the end of the week, whatever is left over I make a fruit salad or I'll sugar and use for a desert topping.
I enjoy going not just for the food and other good sold but the sense of community it brings. We've been talking about being connected to our food and how hunting could bring about this feeling. I have to say talking to the vendors helps me make a connection with the food I eat. Hunting would cause me to disconnect because I would feel horrible about eating something with a face. The opposite happens with my fruits and veggies; when talking to those that have had experience with it. As I buy my produce I take pride in knowing that this is from my community. I get to share in the joy of harvest. 

Farmer's Market

Going to the grocery store with four kids is hectic, however trying to bring them all to an open market with lots of people and LOTS of places to hide, is down right nerve wracking. I can honestly say that I have never been to a Farmers market before, so it was a new experience for me. My two youngest children had a blast, it was fun for them to see all the people, stands and tents. When Nikyla and Kiana get excited it includes a whole lot of running around and screaming! As we attempted to walk through the Market, I noticed that the prices were more than I had expected them to be. Although, while I was looking at prices my kids were tasting things from various stands and picking out all the things they wanted to buy.



Since my kids all love fruit I figured I would buy some and make fruit salad for a Saturday afternoon snack. My older kids helped me pick out the fruit they wanted picking strawberries, grapes and raspberries. By this time my two older kids, Dominic, Mia and I were tired of chasing the girls around.Thus, we decided that our adventure at the Farmer's market was over. Needless to say, I was not able to conduct any type of conversation with stand owners.



After we left the Farmers Market, we stopped at the grocery store to get the rest of the ingredients for our fruit salad. Cool whip is an essential for fruit salad when it comes to my kids.We went home and the kids helped me put the fruit salad together, which was fun. The entire family sat down and enjoyed the fruit salad. This assignment made for an interesting and fun day for my kids and I.


Tiemann,Thomas K., "Grower-only Farmers' Markets:Public Spaces and Third Places" Journal of Popular Culture: Vol 41 Issue 3. p467-487: June 2008

Farmer's Market

Lindsey Crawford

Library 201

2 May 2010

5th Blog

Farmers Market


I love going to the farmer’s market. When I lived in Truckee, CA, going to the farmer’s market every Thursday at the Truckee Regional Park was one of the highlights of my week. It is how I met the owner of the Sierra Valley Organic Farm and ended up volunteering there last spring. That said, the farmer’s market here in Bellingham is also fun; however, the one over at the Public Market does not have as great of a selection as the one in Truckee. It doesn’t have as much choice and the produce is a bit pricey. I like the atmosphere, the kids running around, the chatter, but it is not the same. I feel like it almost has an elitist vibe to it. Talking to a couple of the sellers gave me that impression. Like when I asked one stand--who shall remain nameless to protect their identity--about their produce operations, I got an offended reaction, like I was the health inspector or something. Luckily, other people I talked to were much more accommodating. I got talking to one seller about lettuce for a while. He was telling me how another customer was cracking down on him because his greens were unwashed. I thought that was ridiculous. Greens last longer if they are not washed. And since they are all organic, the seller is not supposed to wash them. He seemed to take great pride in his farm practices, and that customer had really set him off. We had a good rant about it all though, about how corporate farms spray their greens with all kinds of chemicals and his are all natural, yet he gets complaints. We had a good gripe session.

At the market I bought some yummy tomatoes and basil. Then I went to the co-op and got some fresh mozzarella and made a delicious fresh salad with it all. OK, so I also added bacon to it, but everything tastes better with bacon. For dessert I had some kettle corn...mmm...kettle corn. All in all my trip to the farmer’s market was fun, informative and tasty, although I miss the one back in CA--I think I miss the people there more than anything.


Vora, Shivani, “A Virtual Farmer’s Market,” Inc. Apr 2010 Vol 32 Issue 3. Ecohost. Web. 2 May 2010 (107)



Farmer's Market

I live in Seattle, so I visited the farmer’s market in U district yesterday. I’ve never been, so I didn’t know what to expect. Before I went, I looked up a recipe to make. I checked out epicurious.com and I decided to make a mango bread pudding listed right on the main page since I was in a dessert mood. When I got to the market, I thought that it was pretty much how I had pictured it to be, just more crowded than I expected. I started looking at the vendors and going in some tents to search the produce and comparing prices. I found some things to be less expensive compared to how much they’d cost at the grocery store, but I think that for the most part it was more expensive. Also, it was probably a mistake to have looked up a recipe beforehand because I did not find one thing that I needed (besides eggs which I already had at home). I ended up buying some produce as well as a cinnamon roll to go. Afterwards, I went to the Safeway across the street to buy the ingredients for my mango bread pudding.

Going to the farmer’s market was a learning experience and I definitely had a few realizations. First, I remember when we visited the archive building and read the old documents. While reading through menus and cookbooks I wondered why certain recipes were delegated to certain seasons… because recipes were made when ingredients were in season! I enjoy being able to go to the grocery store to buy produce that may not in season or locally grown. Sometimes I may be craving something and I don’t feel like waiting until summer to eat it. Secondly, I realized that I consider grocery shopping to be an autonomous matter. I like to be able to be able to easily navigate a store, find what I need, and checkout (preferably u-scan). I like to go shopping with as little assistance as possible. I noticed at the farmer’s market that this was impossible. I probably sound really antisocial right now but I usually go shopping early in the morning or later at night, soon after I have woken up or before I go to sleep, I usually just feel scrubby and not in a very social mood. The market was also pretty packed which made me feel a little claustrophobic. Something else that I realized is that not only does growing your own produce or hunting your own meat make you become more connected to it, but shopping at places like the farmers market makes you become more connected to your food and also on a social level. Many vendors were friendly, offering samples and explaining how items were grown or processed. It was also a social experience with many groups of people walking around just talking. I believe that there are many other benefits that the farmer’s market has to offer that I didn’t mention such as purchasing local products and buying healthier choices.

After visiting the farmers market I realized some pros/cons of both the market and grocery store that I was unaware of before. Although I would go back to the farmer’s market in the future, I prefer the grocery store.

Eller, Daryn. “Farmer’s Markets a Trip to Bountiful.” Vegetarian Times 297 (2002): 34-40. Print.

Monday, April 26, 2010

You are what you eat...

I love the saying “you are what you eat” because if it is true than I am sugary and sweet. Ever since I was young I ate a lot of candy and sweet foods. To this day I probably eat more sugar than the average person. I’ve also always been pretty skinny; but this is not the same for the rest of my family. One of my family members has suffered from being obese most of my life and even had gastric bypass surgery. Although I’ve never had this issue, it was hard to watch someone I cared about struggle constantly with weight. To support them, I would often practice their diet when eating with them, this made me very aware of diet trends and the effects they had. It also made me feel self-conscience about my weight and fear becoming over weight. Although I have a great fear of it, my eating habits have not changed. As a nation it obesity is a problem we face; fast food places everywhere, children becoming more sedentary, and so many other reasons. What should be done about it? Who is responsible? It is important to look at these things both personally and as a community. I know they only way for me to combat becoming obese is to be aware; the same needs to be done as a nation. 


I am recommending an Opposing View Points book. It presents articles that show different aspects of the topic of obesity.


Obesity : Opposing Viewpoints. Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Print.

We are what we eat


Throughout my life, I have never been given much of an ethic about what foods I eat. I've just obtained what drips down through the socialization I've been taking part in throughout my life, which admittedly, isn't much.
I've never had the money to go out and eat socially, I've never been given meals that consist of more than the bare minimum amount of meats my mother can afford in any one given week. What I'm given is all I get and I've been okay with that.
The one thing I've been taught not to do is eat fast food regularly. My father, whom has always been at a distance from my upbringing, doesn't care one way or another - he just wants me to be fed somehow.
Mum has always told me that fast food isn't something I should be eating because its unhealthy, but aside from that, never gave much more reason to it.
As I've been in school, I've often heard people discuss animal cruelty, PETA, and other related matters. They make good paper topics.
Through my surfing of the internets, I've happened upon videos capturing the brutal killing of animals in various situations - raccoons for their fur, chickens for food in large bloody facilities on conveyor belts and hanging from hooks, and the mistreatment thereof in their dying moments.
These videos have usually been brought to my attention simply because someone wanted to shock everyone and cause a riot... or, as the terminology online goes, a "shitstorm."
Nevertheless, there is a message I have taken away from these videos. I've always had a negative attitude towards the rampant American consumerism. I feel that, the more we rely on mass produced products, the less creativity and variation in products we will experience in any given area. Of course, mass production has many benefits - availability being the most undeniable. But when a particular product comes into high demand, animal products specifically, what we see is a holocaust for the animals required to make such a product.
There is a cause and an effect in this situation. The demand being the cause, and lack of regard/respect and mass destruction of said animal being the result.
Because of this phenomenon, I have always seen *buying* something as *endorsing* all that occurs in the process of creating it. What we need to come to grips with is that *products* aren't created by a magical wizard living in big white building with garage doors on it.

=Getting More to the Point=
So how does this reflect the main topic of this blog post?

When we consume an animal or plant that we have paid for - we are supporting the way it was made. And in this way, we are solely responsible for it. We are the funding.
And much like how, in Gary Snyder's poem "Hunting Season," the deer become a conscious and living part of the person who killed it without the hunter knowing, whether we know or do *not* know... we commit the atrocities that are happening behind the scenes to put food in our hands.
What we need to do in order to avoid this is... well, first get a job that pays you enough money for you to afford all organic foods or the ability to raise your own foods. So, until I am out of college and a part of the working America, I'll have to live with the black blood on my hands.
Anyways, the point being that we need to make educated choices when we choose what we pay for... because you might be paying for a service that isn't what you expected it to be.

*end of official blog post*


Now we all know PETA wants the world to stop using animals for ANYTHING and they'll only be happy when the world stops eating chicken eggs, even if it means using misleading propaganda about egg yoke having a soul - but they have collected some rather shocking instances of really cruel things happening.
Now we can all reassure ourselves that most of the time when we buy "real fur" that this isn't happening behind the scenes. And that there aren't a bunch of sick people killing the chickens we eat by the World War II load every day... but the odds that something like *this* is happening behind the scenes is enough to scare me off.

And yes, this was a shocker vid posted on a website that I was browsing, probably for the sake of getting people worked up. Don't watch it unless you don't plan on sleeping tonight.
http://www.peta.org/feat/chinesefurfarms/index.asp


Singer, Peter, and Mason, Jim. The ethics of what we eat / Peter Singer and Jim Mason Text, Melbourne : 2007

You Are What You Consume

Lindsey Crawford

Library 201

26 April 2010

Blog 4

You Are What You Eat


When my siblings and I were kids, my dad would terrorize with the idiom, “You are what you eat.” He would tell us that when he was a kid, he lived on junk food, greasy, salty, fatty, junk food. And because of this he had terrible skin; he had acne. He hated having acne. So. When he turned 16 he went to a dermatologist and got a skin peel--yes, he had the top layer of his skin peeled off! Then, when my brother, sister and I were all on the verge of vomiting, he’d pipe up and say, “Now remember guys, you are what you eat!” That lesson stayed with me. Despite being a sugar addict--I love gummy bears--I have been good about avoiding fast food: I tend to equate it with acne and getting a skin peel--irrational, I know. Anyway, for most of my youth that cliche saying had negative connotations for me, causing me to not give it too much thought; however, later in life, I began to rethink it--I even wrote paper themed around it once, for this agricultural class called plants and society. The thought that I was entertaining was that now a days the old idiom, “You are what you eat,” doesn’t cut it, especially in America. Instead, it should be revised to, “You are what you consume” because let’s face it, we are consumers--and not just when it comes to food either.

The things we eat, the things we buy, the place we live, the jobs we work at, the majors and career paths we pursue, all these choices are interconnected, and they all say something about who we are. The things we consume define us, and food habits are one way of looking at the definition of who we are. For example, someone who eats all organic, also tends to fall into other categories: they work at a non-corporate job, enjoy exercise, practice yoga, likes to go hiking, likes to commune with the outdoors, doesn’t follow fashion trends, bikes, walks or takes public transport to work, reads the newspaper regularly, reads books, especially ones by new ages authors, is democratic, maybe even socialist, doesn’t spend much time watching TV, is community oriented, believes in affirmative action and the list could go on. On the flip side, someone who routinely eats fast food or makes junk food the staple of their diet can also fall into other categories: works at a fast paced, high stress corporate job--hence eating on the go all the time--, watches a lot of TV, doesn’t like to get outside a lot, is a sports fan, isn’t concerned with monoculture techniques, is more on the conservative side of the spectrum, is into mainstream media trends, likes to go out, isn’t community oriented and, I hate to say, probably is overweight or obese. Now of course there are exceptions to every rule and there are reasons behind every food choice or lifestyle choice. People who come from the last quartile in the socioeconomic ladder are going to have less education about nutrition and wellness and be set up on a more unhealthy track than someone at the top who has the time, leisure and education to devote to a more “natural” lifestyle. And are a host of other reasons for choices. I’d also like to say that choices like these are personal, and I don’t wish to make any normative judgements. All I want to point out is that we are what we consume. The image of ourselves is reflected in our food choices. So if you want to take a closer look at your life, eating habits is a good place to start.


To classify myself, I am a semi-organic, home food, eater. I try to eat organic as much as I can, but can only buy what I can afford. I avoid eating fast food. I don’t eat out much at all. I am not a vegetarian, but I only eat meat in one meal per day, usually it is bacon with breakfast--little quirk about me, my favorite breakfast is a BLT. I enjoy cooking and preparing meals for myself. I am not the best cook, so I have routine meals and stand-byes that I make over and over again. Like for breakfast, I have either a BLT, oatmeal with fruit, cheerio with fruit, corn beef hash (before ski days) or a fresh smoothie and rye toast. For lunch, I am a bean wrap girl; I roll up canned pinto beans, shredded cheddar cheese and Frank’s red hot sauce in a flour tortilla. I also like making tuna salad sandwiches for lunch. For dinner, I make veggie and tofu stir-frys, white lasagna, NY strip and baked potato, steamed veggies with brown rice and homemade cheese sauce or lemon pepper chicken is another favorite. So. What does that say about me? Yes, I am guilty of my own stereotype. I walk, bike or take the bus to get around. I love to ski, hike, climb, kayak and play outdoors. I am an avid reader. I don’t watch TV, but I appreciate film. I netflix instead of paying for cable. I don’t have a job yet; I’m in school, but I am currently pursing a double major in history and economics, with the hopes of becoming a journalist specializing in economic theory and economic thought. Yes, I do love economics. I am no socialist. I am a capitalist--with a heart. I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I consider myself to be a fiscal conservative / social democrat, and I vote for whoever, on either side, the best exemplifies my values. I am a product of my family and culture. I am lucky. Both my parents have advanced degrees. I grew up in an upper-middle class household in upstate NY. My mother is an organic freak. My dad likes to golf. I realize that they are the reason for my stereotypical behavior. I’d like to say it again, I am lucky. And I feel despair for all those who grew up without my advantages. I’d like to believe that I have a sense of entitlement, but I do :(. I hate that. I hate that deep down I am a yuppie, a patagucci wanna-be-hippie. But I am what I consume. I cannot escape that.


Wow, I think that was more than I wanted to share. So I’ll stop now.


Pollan, Michael, In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. New York : Penguin Press, 2008

You Are What You Eat

While thinking about the phrase "you are what you eat" I recognize it in the way that I think most people in mainstream American culture do--health reflects diet. Diet influences both our physical and mental health. The foods that we take into our bodies can range from being very nutritious to being bad for us. If we maintain a healthy diet, we can benefit from good health, greater strength, and possibly a longer life whereas having an unhealthy diet can lead to poorer mental and physical health. Of course diet is only one aspect of our health and other things such as exercise and genetics play a role in our overall health.

While examining the "you are what you eat" phrase, I thought that it can take on many other meaning besides health reflecting diet, as suggested. One other way that I interpret the saying is cultural, you eat what you know and what is available. I believe that for the most part, people's diets consist of resources that are available to them, at least historically. Many islander and seafaring cultures probably have a lot of fish and seafood in their diets, whereas inland cultures probably hunted more often. based on what was available in the environment, cultures had to adapt to what they had and foods became embedded into the culture, even now after Westernization has occurred and many cultures have other food options available to them. besides culture, food is very telling of an individual. By looking in someone's kitchen you may be able to guess their ethnicity, religious affiliations, socioeconomic status, whether they are a college student, a vegetarian, a health freak, or a single parent of two.

Dolfsma, Wilfred. Consuming Symbolic Goods: Identity and Commitment, Values and Economics. New York: Routledge, 2008. Print.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

I was raised to believe that food is something to be greatful for. I believe my teachings can relate to the cliche "You are what you eat" because food is related to every part of our way of life as native people. I was raised by my father, who is currently 77 years old. He was a fisherman his whole life ,as was my grandfather and his father.My husband, brother and brother-in-law's are all fisherman as well.At one time all Xwlemi (Lummi) men were fisherman.
Growing up I was fed salmon, clams, clam chowder or fritters,elk meat, crab, shrimp.These are the foods my father was raised on. My father has a smokehouse in the backyard to smoke fish for the Winter. The first catch of the season, that my husband, brothers and brother-in-laws get, all go to my father. This is how it is in all the families on my reservation. My Dad then smokes the fish and packages it the "modern way", which we were only able to talk him into about 10 years ago.
It is the same tradition with the first deer or elk caught of the season. A prayer is said for the spirit of the deer, A Hyshque for for all it will provide. Every part of the deer is used from the hide to the heart.The hide is dried and used as regalia.My father dries some of the meat and freezes the rest.
Now my Dad teaches my son and nephews how to do all these things so that the traditions can continue. This is the first season my son is able to pull canoe, he is being taught by his grandfather what kind of diet he must follow throughout the season. He must be pure mind, body and soul. Food has nutritional, spiritual and traditional values in my culture. As much as "You are what you eat" is a cliche, I believe our elders would even be able to relate it to our beliefs.
Being taught these beliefs my whole life it is expected of me and my husband to teach them to our children. Our children have grown up understanding the importance of the food we catch, hunt and eat. We now live in a much more modern world than my father or grandfather, however food will always be a rich tradition


"Lummi (Xwlemi)" Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikimedia Foundation n.d. Web 29.Mar.2010

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Blog 3

I have to say that there is a reason I like meat, because I personally don't kill it. Ever since I was a child I have been aware of where meat comes from and what it looked like before it hit the table. Over the years I have been known to refer to myself as a wishful vegetarian. I am not a fan of killing anything really but the taste of a good steak is too hard to pass up. And yes, I order mine rare -- also known as still bleeding. So as you can see I have fixed emotions regarding hunting. I love shooting and go with guy friends but don't think I could turn the gun on a living creature. I killed a pair of raccoons with my car years ago and had to pull over I was so upset.
For some the connection might be stronger. I could understand someone feel proud of the accomplishment -- shooting a moving target is. Hunting can be moral if: it is done humanely, with the intention of using the animal as much as possible, and done legally. There are reasons why the government regulates what can and cannot be hunted. I feel the same standards apply to fishing as well. I do not believe in killing more than is needed.
On page 11 of The Scavenger's Guide to Haute Cuisine, where the deer dies of natural causes and the family then makes it a meal. If I had a choice, this would be how the steak got on my plate each and every time.


1. Costa, Margaret, and Luis Verrissimo. The Club Of Angels. 1 ed. New York: New Directions, 2008. Print.
2. Hayes, Ruth. Gluttony. 1 ed. Seattle, WA: Random Motion, 1985. Print.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Blog 3

Lindsey Crawford

Library 201

19 April 2010

Blog Post 3


Last summer I worked as a part time volunteer for the Sierraville Organic Farm. Once a week, for a period of two months, I donated my time and labor and in return I got a basket filled with fresh organic produce from the Sierraville farm, along with fresh foods from other farms that participated in a weekly local farmers’ market. The Sierraville Farm specializes in greens, romaine, red leaf lettuce, green leaf lettuce, European mix lettuce and spinach. It also grows radishes and carrots. As a volunteer, my job was to harvest and package the produce. Because the farm is all organic, this labor is back breaking, with everything being done by hand and without the help of any herbicides or pesticides. Despite being tired and sore by the end of each day on the farm, this experience was rewarding, giving me a deeper connection to the food I eat and a respect for the agricultural process.


Obtaining food in the U.S is easy. If I am hungry, say for some lettuce, all I have to do is walk down to the co-op and buy a bag and then go home and eat it. However, before the days of supermarkets, drive-throughs and food processing plants, getting a salad was anything but simple. Working on the farm made this clear for me. I realized just how much I took for granted the convenience and availability of food. While I liked working on the farm, I would not want to devote my life to that kind of work day in and day out. It is so time consuming and physically exhausting. With that said, I definitely enjoyed the food I helped, grow, pick and bag myself. It made me feel accomplished.


I have never hunted; however, I think if I did I would feel the same way about the meat from hunting as I did about the produce from farming: connected. The meat that I eat now comes in a package. It doesn’t resemble the animal it came from at all. When I eat meat, I take for granted all the work that went it to getting it onto my table, along with the life that was sacrificed for my meal. I think if I had to hunt my own meat I would probably eat less of it because of a deeper respect for the animal and the work that went into preparing it. I also think it would be hard for me to kill animals on a regular basis because I love them; I have two cats.


Francis, Charles. Organic Farming: The Ecological System. Madison, WI : American Society of Agronomy : Crop Science Society of America : Soil Science Society of America, 2009.


Guthman, Julie. Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.


Sunday, April 18, 2010

Blog #3 - I don't think so, Hunters.

















There are a number of FANTASTIC reasons to harvest your own food, particularly if its green foods. You know. PLANT STUFF!!!
- You get to learn how to grow stuff!
- You can make sure that you aren't ingesting anything unnatural!
- You get to be self-reliant!
- Its probably less expensive in the long run!

Having had parents who like to grow their own foods in the past, I've tried home grown greens first hand and they are definitely better than any frozen foods you might buy in the grocery store. And you don't need to wash them off or anything! Right? Right. Well, you might want to do that just to be safe, but I didn't.
My father was known to grow tons of corn and tomatoes, and my mother loves to grow strawberries. This home grown produce has always been much more flavorful than that at the store, and that's all that honestly counts, right? Right - that thing.

Now, you're probably asking, "Greens? But what about meat and dairy products?" am I right?
Well, there is nothing but downside after downside to producing THOSE goods on your own.
- Animal shit.
- Buying animal food.
- Owning pasture land.
- Getting too attached.
- And let's not forget the animal sex farms we've all been hearing about.
Lets not even open that Pandora's box.

As I mentioned, spending so much time, money, and effort on an animal causes one to naturally become attached to it - as it is the product of your great work. Myself, I would feel pretty hesitant about essentially killing an animal, eating it, and promptly transforming it into shit through my bowels in a matter of hours after having spent MONTHS, maybe even YEARS, raising it.
With such an efficient mass animal genocide killing machine working behind the scenes to easily produce meat and dairy products for us in the grocery store at all times, that has spent decades building the harvest population of various animals for our consumption, why go to so much trouble to achieve the same thing at such a higher cost?

In response to The Scavenger's Guide to Haute Cuisine and The Urban Deerslayer... I think that the italicization and bold facing of the fonts on this site is completely dildos.

Okay, now that we’re typing this out in Word for the sake of not looking like a type-face illiterate, 12 year old, YouTube commenting juggalo…

In response to the aforementioned works, I think that both of them are ridiculous and unnecessary considering my previous comment about how harvesting your own live stalk or dairy products is obsolete.

The only reason to hunt, raise, or have sex with animals is for posterity, being an inexplicable and insatiable fetishist, or “quality time” with your family. Let us pray that no one has the audacity to mix any of those together.

[Of course, all of this is true assuming that you’re an urban dwelling middle to upper class American like everyone else in my Library research class.]

[Finding books to share]